top of page

Aerodynamics Effects of Buildings on a Bus

Aerothermal Fluids Lab, Spring 2018

Goal

Observe the effects of buildings on the lift, drag, and pressure along a model MTA bus in a wind tunnel

Results

Buildings increase drag but also increase negative lift which is important for traction for control and turning

mta bus setup.PNG

​Scenario 1

No buildings

Scenario 2

Buildings on both sides

Scenario 3

Connected buildings on the left and gap between buildings on the right

Preparing the Model

Picture2.png

Holes were drilled into the model to make room for pressure taps.  Each tap was labeled by numbers.

front.PNG
back.PNG
top.PNG
side.PNG

Construction

Picture5.jpg
Picture4.png
Picture3.png

The platform of the bus was made with 2 layers of foam with wood support beams.  The foam was easier to cut and shape for our various scenarios.

Picture7.png

The pressure taps were crazy glued and the buildings were made of thick paper.  Legs were installed onto the buildings to be inserted into the platform.

Picture6.png

Experimental Setup - Scenario 1 - No Buildings

Picture9.png
Picture8.png

Experimental Setup - Scenario 2 - Connected Buildings on Both Sides

2nd config 2.png
2nd config 3.png
2nd config.png

Experimental Setup - Scenario 3 - Gap Between Buildings on Right

3rd config 2.png
3rd config 3.png

Results

test 1.PNG

Scenario 1

No Buildings

test 2.PNG

Scenario 2

Connected Buildings

test 3.PNG

Scenario 3

Gap Between Buildings on Right Side

front plot.PNG

Pressure Along Front Side

​

The points on the plot align with the location of the taps on the bus shown on the right.  Notice the trend remains the same in all 3 cases, such that the pressure is higher at the bottom than the top.  Interestingly, have some buildings and a gap between them had the least pressure compared to having no buildings or having all buildings.

top plot.PNG

Pressure Along Top

​

The two vertical gray lines represent where the gap between the buildings was in relation with the bus.  Here, the pressure values of the 3rd scenario, buildings with a gap, is slightly between the values of no buildings and all buildings.  However, the difference is small.  Interesting observations that can lead to future analysis or discussion is the effects of the objects on the roof of the bus with the pressure values.

back plot.PNG

Pressure Along Back

​

Like the front of the bus, the pressure is higher at the bottom than the top.  Also similiar to the results of the top side, the buildings with a gap in between have pressure values that are between the values of the scenarios with all connected buildings and no buildings.

side plot.PNG

Pressure Along Side

​

In all three scenarios, the trend appears to show a gradual increase in pressure as you move along the length of the bus.  However, notice the pressure increases the most for scenario three at the side of the bus that is exposed to the gap between the buildings.

lift and drag.PNG

Lift and Drag Results

​

Negative lift is a downward force that helps vehicles with traction and control, especially when making sharp turns.  Here, you can see that although the drag is the highest in scenario 2, when there are buildings on both sides, there is more negative lift on the sides of the bus.  As expected, scenario 3 still exhibits a trend with values in between scenarios 1 and 2.  The results are satisfactory and reveal interesting insight on how the architecture of our cities affect the aerodynamics of our vehicles.

Uncertainty Calculations for pressure, lift, and drag

uncertainty 1.PNG
uncertainty 2.PNG
bottom of page